Comparison • Updated
This page compares the current consumer experiences of Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini across models, reasoning, research, multimodal features, integrations, privacy posture, and pricing—so you can pick the best tool for your workflow.
If you read nothing else, read this:
Jump to: side-by-side table • recommendations • pricing • FAQ
Skim this first. The sections below add context and decision guidance.
| Category | Claude (Anthropic) | Gemini (Google) |
|---|---|---|
| Current consumer models |
Sonnet 4.5Opus 4.5Haiku 4.5
Extended thinking; strong writing + coding defaults.
|
Gemini “3 Pro” (plan pages)2.5 Pro + “Deep Think” (Ultra rollout)
Premium tiers emphasize higher limits + advanced features.
|
| Workspace integration | Connect Google Workspace on Pro for context; primary experience is still Claude as a dedicated app. | Excellent: native in Gmail/Docs/Slides/Sheets/Meet on eligible plans. |
| Reasoning & complex problem solving |
Strong: extended thinking + robust long-form synthesis.
Watch: pick Sonnet vs Opus based on difficulty. |
Strong: premium “Deep Think” style reasoning in the Ultra roadmap.
Watch: availability/features can be tier/region gated. |
| Research & web browsing | Free includes web search; Pro adds Research and higher usage. | Deep Research highlighted in AI Ultra and broader Google ecosystem; also appears across Google AI plans. |
| Images | Image input supported; outputs are text (plan features vary). | Image tools often paired with creative suite benefits; higher tiers emphasize creative generation workflows. |
| Video generation | Not the core consumer differentiator vs Google’s creative suite. | Veo/Flow/Whisk emphasized on Pro/Ultra tiers, with higher usage limits at the top end. |
| Pricing headline (U.S.) | Pro: $20/mo (or $17/mo annual) • Max: from $100/mo | AI Pro: ~$19.99/mo • AI Ultra: $249.99/mo (other tiers vary) |
Tip: If you’re choosing for a team, focus on Workspace, Integrations, and Pricing.
In practice, you’re choosing a bundle: model access + tools + usage limits + integrations. Both products update frequently, so use plan pages for the latest model names.
For many teams, the winner is the one that reduces context switching.
If research matters, run the same test on both tools: “Summarize,” “cite,” “compare,” and “extract a table.” The best tool is the one that reliably produces outputs you can verify.
Most users choose here based on their content pipeline.
Choose based on where your data and daily tools live.
For high-stakes work, confirm the exact plan terms and admin controls. Consumer plans and team/enterprise plans differ meaningfully.
Prices and availability can vary by country and billing channel. Use these as a starting point, then confirm on the official plan pages.
$20/month (or $17/month annual)
More usage, Research, unlimited projects, Google Workspace connection, extended thinking, and access to more models.
~$19.99/month
Gemini Pro model access + Workspace features (plan-dependent) and bundled benefits.
$249.99/month
Highest usage limits + premium features, including Deep Think rollout language and Veo-based creative tools.
Buying for a team? Compare Claude Team vs Google Workspace plans with Gemini for admin controls, SSO, and data boundaries.
Workspace-first? Start with Gemini. Writing-first and deep thinking across long tasks? Start with Claude Pro.
If you live in Google Workspace, Gemini’s native integration is typically the most seamless option. Claude can connect to Workspace for context, but your primary workflow still happens inside the Claude app.
Claude is often favored for long-form writing and editing. Gemini is strong for quick drafting inside Docs and summarizing email and meeting content. Your best answer comes from testing with your own writing tasks.
Only if you regularly hit limits or need the highest throughput. Many professionals do great on the ~$20/month tiers.
Primary references for plan pricing, model lineups, and plan features.
Tip: Refresh this page quarterly as plans and model names change.